Navigating Complex Manufacturing Disputes with Forensic Investigation and Quantum Analysis

Case Study

Background

A state-of-the-art steel manufacturing facility experienced prolonged downtime due to a series of equipment malfunctions and operational inefficiencies. The disruptions led to significant delays in meeting production targets, escalating into a dispute between the

facility owner, equipment supplier, and contractor. The case involved claims of defective equipment, improper installation, and resource mismanagement, resulting in financial losses and reputational damage.

DAC Consulting Services was engaged to provide forensic engineering and quantum analysis to determine the root causes of the failures, quantify the financial impacts, and support dispute resolution.

Challenges

The manufacturing dispute involved several interrelated challenges:

1. Technical Failures: Identifying the root causes of equipment malfunctions, including potential design flaws and installation errors.

2. Operational Disruptions: Understanding how inefficiencies and downtime impacted production schedules and output.

3. Financial Quantification: Calculating the financial losses incurred due to equipment downtime and associated operational inefficiencies.

4. Complex Stakeholder Claims: Resolving competing claims of liability among the facility owner, contractor, and equipment supplier.

5. Regulatory Scrutiny: Ensuring compliance with industry standards and safety regulations in all analyses and findings.

DAC’s Role

DAC was engaged as the lead expert consultant to provide a multidisciplinary analysis that

addressed both technical and financial aspects of the dispute. Our role included:

1. Forensic Engineering Investigation:

• Conducted a root cause analysis of the equipment failures, examining design specifications, installation records, and operational data.
  
• Performed material and stress testing to identify contributing factors, such as mechanical wear, substandard materials, or improper commissioning practices.
• Assessed compliance with industry standards and best practices.

2. Operational Analysis:

• Evaluated the impact of downtime on production targets, identifying inefficiencies in resource management and scheduling.
• Reviewed historical data to establish baseline operational performance for comparison.

3. Quantum Analysis:

• Quantified the financial impact of downtime, including lost revenue, increased operational costs, and additional resource requirements.
• Evaluated claims for equipment replacement and compensation for extended project timelines.

4. Expert Reporting and Support:



• Delivered a detailed expert report integrating technical findings with financial analyses, providing a cohesive narrative for arbitration.
• Provided expert testimony to clarify findings and address counterarguments during dispute resolution proceedings.

London (HQ) Office

Contact our expert team today for an initial consultation or advice on your requirement.

Methodology

DAC adopted a systematic approach to address the multifaceted nature of the dispute:

1. Root Cause Analysis:

• Used advanced diagnostic tools, such as finite element analysis (FEA) and operational simulations, to pinpoint failure mechanisms.
• Examined maintenance records and operational logs to identify deviations from standard procedures.

2. Financial Quantification:

• Developed a detailed cost-impact model to assess losses from downtime and inefficiencies.
• Cross-referenced contractual terms and production data to validate claims for additional costs.

3. Stakeholder Coordination:

• Collaborated with legal teams and key stakeholders to ensure alignment between findings and the overall dispute resolution strategy.

Outcome

DAC’s expert analysis and testimony were instrumental in resolving the dispute efficientlyand equitably. Key findings included:

• Identification of a design flaw as the primary cause of the equipment failure, with partial responsibility attributed to improper commissioning practices.
• Quantification of financial losses that were consistent with production data and contractual terms, ensuring the client’s claims were substantiated.
• Recommendations for improved operational protocols and equipment maintenance practices to prevent future disruptions.

The resolution enabled the facility to resume production on an adjusted timeline, minimising further financial and operational risks while preserving stakeholder relationships.

Key Takeaways

1. Multidisciplinary Analysis: Combining forensic engineering with operational and quantum expertise provides a comprehensive understanding of manufacturing disputes.

2. Clear Attribution of Liability: Detailed root cause analyses ensure fair allocation of responsibility among stakeholders.

3. Accurate Financial Quantification: Fact-based quantum analyses support robust claims and effective dispute resolution.

4. Collaborative Approach: Engaging all stakeholders ensures transparency and alignment throughout the resolution process.

5. Preventative Insights: Forensic investigations offer actionable recommendations to improve future operational resilience.

By leveraging DAC’s expertise, the client successfully navigated a complex manufacturing dispute, restoring operations and safeguarding their financial and reputational interests.